|
"The glassy
man customer citizen" Almost every citizen isn't him it himself stored, usually wisely approximately 80 databases. The banks, department stores etc., are but the Internet is joining now, had had 34.5 million people in Germany access to the Internet, almost every supermarket and every department store offers store cards, all the tickets for the soccer World Cup in 2006 were equipped with special chips last year (2004) on which the person-related information from the buyer is stored the normal. Collecting data lies in the trend. The risk potential from a protection of data privacy legal view lets itself be seen approximately at the credit card companies, the information about the buying behavior of millions of customers who far too carelessly unfortunately handle their personal data, stored or for airline companies which have the journey data of thousands of passengers. There is the danger that immense amounts of data lead to a supervision and control possibility from the most different areas. But what every single day gathers the enterprises geshieht with all the "digital data" these? Customer data are passed on, the profit is at first place, the single doesn't count, .er is the victim of the Kopnsums the person bought. This happens to the persons affected since be the single cannot decide what evaluated and continued to use, happened what it includes how to his data, himself know without most. To receive the right evaluation with this high tide of data, e.g. almost
all credit institutions use so-called Scoring systems to find the credit
standing of their customers out. What is, one Scoring-systems take we
live in it nobly to them in Munich once, suburb Grünwald you then
would have a high credit standing? If, on the other hand, you live in
Munich's district "Hasenbergl", its credit standing would be
zero at once. No, this isn't a Zukunftvision, it is up-to-date already. If your villa is in the wrong street, then you deliver only toward pre-cash. This isn't only protection of data privacy legally problematic but also sociopolitical this will be clear for everybody. The possibility is taken deciding even on its phenotype in public but the single one. Who protects us from the arbitrary exploitation of the person-related
data? It looks so short-term that a young person who couldn't pay once
a mobile telephone invoice with 20 years then can open no more account,
no apartment thinks doesn't get any insurance contract and alone the
dentures are granted only toward pre-cash. |